<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congrats Ryan May!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.werty.net/2006/02/congrats-ryan-may.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.werty.net/2006/02/congrats-ryan-may.html</link>
	<description>"1 Part Professional, 2 Parts Crazy"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:13:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reeves</title>
		<link>http://www.werty.net/2006/02/congrats-ryan-may.html/comment-page-1#comment-83713</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.werty.net/2006/02/congrats-ryan-may.html#comment-83713</guid>
		<description>Restaurantica is a great idea until your restaurant gets panned by someone who is out to do damage to your business purposely.
A review surfaced about my restaurant recently that clearly showed that the patron was not even here. The meal he reviewed is served only on weekends and not on the week night he says he was present. Then to make matters worse, within the review he recommends a competing restaurant.
As an owner you have no opportunity to respond to these to these attacks and expose them for what they really are. How fair is it to review a restaurant and within the text recommend another?
Doesn&#039;t that say something about the content and purpose. This site is open to a lot of abuse.
Wellington&#039;s Pub and Grill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Restaurantica is a great idea until your restaurant gets panned by someone who is out to do damage to your business purposely.<br />
A review surfaced about my restaurant recently that clearly showed that the patron was not even here. The meal he reviewed is served only on weekends and not on the week night he says he was present. Then to make matters worse, within the review he recommends a competing restaurant.<br />
As an owner you have no opportunity to respond to these to these attacks and expose them for what they really are. How fair is it to review a restaurant and within the text recommend another?<br />
Doesn&#039;t that say something about the content and purpose. This site is open to a lot of abuse.<br />
Wellington&#039;s Pub and Grill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 6/13 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk

Served from: www.werty.net @ 2012-02-08 02:34:53 -->
